Why 72 PPI Isn’t Necessary for Digital Images: Understanding the Truth
If you’ve ever been told that your digital images should be set at 72 PPI (pixels per inch) for optimal results, you’re not alone. This advice has been around for years, but it no longer applies in today’s world—especially for those of us passionate about capturing wildlife or landscapes, whether in vivid colour or the rich contrasts of black-and-white photography. Let’s break down why 72 PPI isn’t necessary for digital images and explore what truly matters when sharing your photographic journey online.
Left image 72 ppi vs 300 ppi Right image
The Myth of 72 PPI in Digital Images
The idea that 72 PPI is ideal for digital displays goes back to the 1980s when Apple’s Macintosh screens were built with a 72 PPI resolution. Back then, it made sense to match the resolution of images to the capabilities of early computer monitors. However, in the age of high-definition screens and Retina displays, PPI has become mostly irrelevant for digital images. Instead, the total pixel dimensions of the image (the number of pixels wide and tall) are what determine how clear and sharp your images appear online.
So Why Does the 72 PPI Recommendation Persist?
The 72 PPI standard persists in some software defaults, mainly for backward compatibility with older systems and software like Photoshop. However, with the rise of high-definition and Retina displays, the notion of optimizing for 72 PPI no longer holds true. Modern screens, whether they’re smartphones, tablets, or 4K monitors, have far higher pixel densities than the screens of the past.
Left image 72 ppi vs 300 ppi Right image
Focus on Pixel Dimensions, Not PPI
When displaying images online, especially for showcasing wildlife or landscape photography, what matters most are the pixel dimensions—the width and height of your image in pixels. For example, an image that is 1920×1080 pixels will display perfectly on a 1080p monitor, regardless of whether it’s set to 72 PPI or 300 PPI.
The key is to match your image’s dimensions to the resolution of the display it will be viewed on. Upscaling a smaller image (e.g., 800×600 pixels) to fit a larger display can result in a pixelated or blurry appearance. But this has nothing to do with the PPI setting.
Left image 72 ppi vs 300 ppi Right image
PPI Is Important for Printing, Not Screens
It’s important to note that PPI matters when preparing images for print. In the printing world, a higher PPI (usually around 300) ensures better clarity and sharpness. But for digital use—whether you’re sharing your photography on a blog or social media—PPI won’t affect the image quality. What truly counts is ensuring your image has the correct pixel dimensions for the platform it’s being displayed on.
Key Factors for Best Looking Images on Digital Displays
So, if 72 PPI isn’t the secret to great-looking digital images, what is? Here are the key factors to focus on:
- Correct resolution for the display: Match your image’s pixel dimensions (e.g., 1920×1080) to the resolution of the screen where it will be displayed. If you’re unsure of the display resolution, try to save your images at commonly used resolutions (such as 1080p or 4K).
- No scaling artifacts: Avoid upscaling (stretching a small image to fit a large display), as this will result in a pixelated or blurry image. Always upload images that are sized correctly for their display.
- Compression and file format: Make sure your images are saved in a format that preserves quality. JPEG is great for smaller file sizes but can cause quality loss if compressed too much. PNG is ideal for maintaining high quality but results in larger file sizes.
Left image 72 ppi vs 300 ppi Right image
Wildlife and Landscape Photography Online
As a wildlife or landscape photographer, focusing on the resolution and format of your digital images is essential for displaying your work in the best possible light. Whether you’re sharing an awe-inspiring shot of an African lion or a dramatic black-and-white landscape, your image’s quality will be defined by its pixel dimensions and the attention you give to its format—not by the 72 PPI setting.
Conclusion: Moving Beyond 72 PPI for Better Images
In conclusion, the idea that 72 PPI is necessary for digital images is outdated. With modern displays offering much higher pixel densities, your best bet is to focus on ensuring your images have the correct pixel dimensions for the platforms where they will be viewed. Whether you’re displaying your wildlife or landscape photography online, remember that resolution, not PPI, determines how your images appear.
For more in-depth tips on showcasing your photography, visit our Photography Resources page. If you’re new to landscape photography and want to learn about resolutions for digital images, be sure to check out this guide on mastering resolution for high-quality visuals.
Now that you have the facts, you can confidently share your wildlife and landscape photography, knowing that you’re using the right technical knowledge to make your images shine online.
Left image 72 ppi vs 300 ppi Right image
References for Technical Aspects (PPI, Resolution, Digital Images):
Adobe – Understanding Image Resolution
-
- A comprehensive guide from Adobe on how image resolution and pixel dimensions affect image quality in Photoshop, including digital displays and print.
PetaPixel – The 72 PPI Web Resolution Myth
-
- A well-explained article debunking the 72 PPI myth and why it doesn’t apply to digital screens anymore.
Cambridge in Colour – Image Resolution Explained
-
- This photography resource dives deep into image resolution, including how PPI affects print and digital images.
Photography Life – Understanding Image Resolution and PPI
-
- An excellent guide explaining the difference between resolution, PPI, and DPI in digital images and why pixel dimensions are more important for digital display.